Kendall brooks planetsuzy

Kendall Brooks Planetsuzy Mama Lutscht Riesenschwanz Bbw Reiten Orgasmus Liliana Rayne Porno

Kostenlose Porno Videos Xvideos, Pornhub, xnxx - Kendall Brooks Planetsuzy - Kostenloser Porno Download - Mobiler Porno - Deutsch Porno Video - Nackt. Kostenlose Porno Videos Xvideos, Pornhub, xnxx - Animals32 - Kostenloser Porno Download - Mobiler Porno - Deutsch Porno Video - Kendall Brooks Planetsuzy. Jennifer Lopez Cum Tribut Kostenlose Amateur Sex Bilder Der Heißeste Blonde Porno Große Iranische Truhe Sieh Dir Fünfzig Graustufen Kostenlos Online An. Find and Watch the best brooke van buuren planetsuzy porno videos at RajWap. Busty girl kendall brooks loves his hard thing · Brooke logan masturbating. Sind brustvergrößerungspillen gefährlich. Angie harmon em biquíni. Kendall brooks nu. Adolescente meu espaço gilrs najed. Empress ireland myt suger.

Kendall brooks planetsuzy

Amature Sex Heiß Aspen Brooks Galerie Italienische Filme , Lesben Mädchen Reitet Waschmaschine Heiße Milf Cum Kendall Kayden Uma Jolie. Selena gomez planetsuzy Rukia und ichigo Kendall Brooks, Megan Monroe, Daisy Marie, Nikki Benz, Julia Bond in bigtits Free Hot Porn Video. The Bang. Chloe Nacht Planetsuzy Paige James Videos Olivia Munn Xvideo Alley Mills Nackt Kendall Jenner Gefälschte Bilder Guardami Film Online Youtube Kostenlose Anal Hausgemacht Domina Muskelvideos Brooke Baldwin Gefälschte Akte. German mom fucked by two construction workers. Paradise films beautiful blonde loves a rough fuck. Lily presley porno. Classic german porn- 7. Sie können auch mögen Neueste von Alexandra Lujan. Ts Latina chicas kakes. Amateur blonde Lana rhoades bill bailey brunette start with each other and add a cock. German blonde busty and hairy. Well shaped nice blonde April Flowers beauty rides dick in Chat con chicas gratis pick-up truck. Pottsaeue - part 2. Ouvrez Doujin hentai session ou inscrivez-vous. Metro - Dumb Ass - scene 2. Classic german porn- 7. German real swinging Sex with my girlfriend video a club by cattg Anorsel 18 wird kraeftig gefickt. Great german mature. Unmistaken at German family 3. Der brief. Gio Find adult. Long Free china porno from europe. Junge debutantinnen Schulmadchen, die wissen wollen. No other sex tube is more popular and features more Kendall Jenner scenes than Pornhub! Sperma tief Ich liebe große schwänze meinem hals. New babefriend german ggg spritzen goo girls. Live Cam Models - Online Now. Christine 3. Buskirk at Kendall brooks planetsuzy

Kendall Brooks Planetsuzy Video

Krissy Lynn fights disease

Kendall Brooks Planetsuzy Video

Mischa Brooks pornstar interview

Show More. You need to upgrade your Adobe Flash Player to watch this video. Download it from Adobe. Download Video.

Favourites Add to favorites Thank you for favoriting! Comments 5 Share. Subscribe Subcribe to this video owner. Report This Video as Inappropriate Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about the video, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates our guidelines or isn't appropriate for all viewers.

Abusing this feature is also a violation of the Community Guidelines, so don't do it. You don't have to wait for the first bone to break. But the law has also been used to excuse violence in deadly neighbor arguments, bar brawls, road rage — even a gang shoot-out — that just as easily might have ended with someone walking away.

Quote: In , two gangs in Tallahassee got into a shoot-out. A year-old boy was killed. A judge dismissed charges against the shooters, citing "stand your ground.

On the radio I heard the following items about Zimmerman: He applied to police school or whatever it is called to become a cop but was turned down.

His record includes assaulting a police officer, though it is expunged or something. And the police don't actually know where he is at the moment, he could have left the state.

The local police very much failed to do what normally they do, such as administering drug and sobriety tests. The police procedures that allow them to say "he shot and killed a person, but he's got a bloody nose, so you are free to go" are very much inadequate.

I would have thought that killing someone with a gun or knife or almost any manner outside of a car crash would require a trip down to the police station.

As for the cry for help, I've read that when some of the local witnesses who heard it said the boy cried out for help, the police corrected them saying it was Zimmerman.

Not quite sure how they know that since they weren't there when it happened, and are just eating up what Zimmerman told them.

Anyways, if the Stand Your Ground law allows someone to chase another person down shoot them, then give themselves a bloody nose who knows when that happened , then there are serious problems.

This story sounds like Zimmerman is guilty of murder. Tracy Martin, the father of the slain teen, said police told him that Zimmerman's background was "squeaky clean.

That allowed him to legally obtain the weapon he was carrying the night of the shooting. Zimmerman and his father have temporarily left their home, after they were the subject of death threats, according to media reports.

Ku Klux Klan Act wrote: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

I want to know more about this 'neighborhood watch' group Federal homicide law generally follows the common law scheme whereby intent can be formed in an instant and the burden of proving mitigation to manslaughter is on the defendant.

S Gun rights types should be running as far away from this guy as possible. This is not the kind of press you want.

Paltivar wrote: The St. Interestingly, I read identical or nearly-so text in another article, not that one.

But that's the stuff I was thinking of. I did find another article, spurred on to search, that indicated that the teen in question was a member of one of those gangs.

I'd be curious about the particulars about that case. It's apparently not uncommon for a lot of local elected judges not to even have a law education, and as a result aren't exactly the most knowledgeable on the law.

I know at least I've read of a number of cases here in PA where a defense attorney had to attempt to politely educate some local-yokel judge on matters of law.

Though without details I can't say that's what happened here, I wouldn't be totally surprised if some idiot elected judge heard about Florida's new law and decided it meant he had to let these guys go.

Although I thought that elected judges typically only handled minor criminal cases misdemeanor stuff , not felony matters.

Maybe someone like Faramir can weigh in here, assuming anyone can even track down the details of the case. Ars of Ares wrote: BarCode wrote: I also have to say that the stench of racism is all over this from how the young man was suspected of being a criminal and suspicious by Zimmerman to the way the police handled it subsequently.

I will post links to calls when I get to a computer that can access them I knew I had read the account of 'witness tampering' somewhere: "Another officer corrected a witness after she told him that she heard the teen cry for help.

The officer told the witness, a long-time teacher, that it was Zimmerman who cried for help, the witness told ABC News.

My strong suspicion is because the victim was a young black male. BarCode wrote: Ars of Ares wrote: BarCode wrote: I also have to say that the stench of racism is all over this from how the young man was suspected of being a criminal and suspicious by Zimmerman to the way the police handled it subsequently.

There was also the fact that the person yelling for help abruptly ceased when the shots rang out. Quote: "Self defense is self defense, whether it's a gang member or any person on the street," says John Eagen, Andrae Tyler's Attorney.

But for the family of year-old Michael Jackson who was shot and killed during the exchange of fire that night back in , they might think differently.

With a clean slate, but remorse for what happened, Tyler says he's thankful for a second chance. I finally got myself on the right track and I know what I need to be doing from now on," says Andrae Tyler.

Tyler says he's been working on his G. The manslaughter charges against the other defendant Jeffrey Brown have also been dropped, but he's serving a 5 year sentence for his involvement in the first shooting that took place that same night.

Edit: put some tags and context since not on mobile. Seems the prosecution attempted to prove that the defendant instigated the conflict, and were unable to do so.

It seems the courts final ruling was based upon "whether the defendants had a right to defend themselves regardless of whether they were gang members".

To be fair, the law made no distinction on that particular point before or after "Stand Your Ground", nor necessarily should it.

Frankly something like this could have easily happened before "Stand Your Ground". The law merely ended the requirement that someone engaged in self-defense affirmatively prove that they did everything possible to avoid violence and lacked any avenue of retreat.

So if in a similar situation someone with a gang-affiliation were able to prove that they attempted to retreat say they ran when attacked but found themselves cornered , you could still get a scenario whereby someone with a gang affiliation shot someone and was acquitted.

The final entry in that article mentions that the prosecution files an appeal, but it ends there. So it seems there may be more to the story.

I can't find anything about the appeal going to trial, so I'm guessing the appeal was declined. I don't know how to look it up directly.

To be fair, the law makes no distinction on that particular point, nor necessarily should it. And that ought to be a gigantic red fucking flag.

Two gangs can 'rumble' and the survivors, who showed up with the intent to do murder, can all plead self-defense, just because the other side ALSO showed up to do murder.

That's fucking NUTS. It's essentially a license to simply be the survivor, and commit all crimes in an absence of credible witnesses.

I disagree. Quote: The scenario I have playing out in my mind is a dumbass who imagines himself to be a cop, correcting the injustices he sees in the world.

If it went down like this, which I agree sounds like the most likely option, then clearly Zimmerman's intent was to provoke an altercation.

An altercation that would justify him using the threat of force i. Now I know the law likely wouldn't see it that way, but from a common sense standpoint that's what it looks like to me.

Yeah, the scenario eXcelon mapped out there is textbook Murder 2. Chiaroscuro wrote: And that ought to be a gigantic red fucking flag.

The problem was that the prosecution failed to prove the points you made regarding some sort of "rumble" entered into by both sides.

And it's not like it's inconceivable that someone with a gang affiliation might actually be ambushed without ever willingly entering the fight, that happens all the time.

One of the firearms instructors I've worked with is also an attorney, and he gives a pretty good seminar on self-defense law. I forget the exact legal terminology, but there's a specific concept related to "fighting" ie: violence entered into willingly by both sides which typically negates protections in self-defense law.

He pointed out that it's much harder to prove self-defense in that kind of situation, though not impossible: For example if one made the mistake of getting into a fist-fight with someone stupid, but it happens , but the other guy escalated to weapons or otherwise presented some sort of deadly threat, one would first need to signal that they were no longer a willing participant in the altercation before one would be justified in deadly force.

This is an excerpt from Pennsylvania law, which similarly has no "duty to retreat" in public, functionally equivalent to "stand your ground".

Quote: 18 Pa. If you provoke the conflict, you're no longer the innocent party. Granted this is PA law, not FL law, but one would think there would be something similar.

And if there isn't something like this in FL law, then that's the problem, not the question of whether or not one has a duty to retreat first.

I don't think Florida's law is identical, and even if so, it's clearly NOT being interpreted as such. I'm trying to reply, you're editing your post, i'm re-reading and trying to re-edit I'm done tonight.

Chiaroscuro wrote: I don't think Florida's law is identical, and even if so, it's clearly NOT being interpreted as such.

It may well differ in important ways, but my point is that the "provocation" clause has nothing in particular to do with "Stand Your Ground".

Pennsylvania recently repealed it's "duty to retreat" in public provisions, though the law was billed as an "Enhanced Castle Doctrine" rather than "Stand Your Ground" nothing more than marketing , but the section that defined justifiable force including the provocation clause were unchanged.

That said, it's not clear to me that Florida doesn't have a similar provision. You aren't wanting to see it then, for example Teen Pregnancy rates are higher among Evangelical Christians Who says blacks look to them?

And who cares about them in this debate about whether Zimmerman is culpable? You brought them up to sidetrack this thread.

SB: What? And by the way.. Chicago has nothing to do with this thread.. You're just repeating racist memes.

Quote: Chicago has horrible gun murder rates and we don't hear the black mouthpieces uttering one word decrying it. More despicable lies already rebutted: viewtopic.

All blacks look to them, eh? Since you would usually become apoplectic if someone made such a bold statement, support for this bald-faced lie is requested.

DanaR wrote: Pontiphex wrote: I'm really racking my brain on how a evangelical christian is demonstrating such lack of concern for his fellow man.

Demonstrably false. Quote: In , independently-registered researcher and author Arthur Brooks tackled the issue of political ideology as it pertains to giving.

Interestingly, on average, conservatives earn less than liberals. Ars of Ares wrote: leavitron wrote: If they feel that GZ took the law into his own hands when he shot TM, how are they any better for wanting revenge on GZ?

Faramir wrote: No part of the Bible has anything to say about marijuana. I may not be fashion conscious, but I am fully aware that I am not bound by the Levitican Law that you are so fond of referencing.

What percantage of those donations are to hate mongerers pretending to be followers of Jesus? Giving money so you can pay your pastor's salary and buy a full city block for your mega-church is super duper generous, but I'm not sure it off-sets shit like actively working to prevent gay people from getting married.

I guess caring for your fellow man is in the eye of the beholder, however. RDeVoe wrote: Quote: I've known some that way. I genuinely don't see it.

And I know at least one Evangelical with a pregnant teen. The prohibition against incest also appears in Leviticus, so I guess you must be okay with that too?

Jesse L. Jackson, Sr. Sabina pastor Fr. No, I'm pointing to individuals who are hypocrites and race baiters. It's cool though, we all have them.

Faramir wrote: leavitron wrote: Faramir wrote: No part of the Bible has anything to say about marijuana. The gay stuff, too.

Faramir wrote: What percantage of those donations are to hate mongerers pretending to be followers of Jesus?

I'd be curious to see a breakdown that actually evaluates money given to actually, you know, help people. It's entirely possible that Conservatives do in fact give more, but numbers inflated paying Pastor Molestor's salary or buying even bigger stained-glass windows and a new PA system or funding your favorite gay-hating group in no way, shape or form should flatly factor into that metric.

Of course this ignores the fact that comparing how much money given by people who loosely think the church can fix it all with people who loosely think society infrastructure is best suited to fix problems is an absurd apples and oranges comparison; according to those numbers giving ten bucks to your church makes you generous even if it just goes to buy a new pope hat, but wanting your own taxes to go up to guarantee a social safety net does not.

MightySpoon wrote: Quote: See above. Look at your quote. Look at my quote. Now back to mine. Now to yours. Now back to mine, again. You added "all," not I.

Stop being an asshole and putting words in my mouth. You're a liar, as has been proven. Pretty sure lying, bearing false witness, etc. Might want to think about getting that log out of your eye.

MightySpoon wrote: leavitron wrote: papadage wrote: I will repeat.. That might be in the part of the bible he considers obsolete.

Nothing has been proven. You cannot see into my heart to know what I am feeling. But you can prove it, or back the fuck down. You are correct, it is not any different.

That said, given the situation as I understand it, and Zimmerman's statements to the dispatcher and afterward , and Zimmerman's history, and his credibility and conduct issues - personally, I think it's most likely what happened.

Quote: It is possible that a whole lot of things could have happened. Ultimately this is what it comes down to. No legal system is perfect, and sometimes people we're sure are guilty of doing something terrible get to walk away.

However the alternative to that is a system I don't want to contemplate existing. Who you brought up in the first place. The opinion of Sharpton and Jackson are not part of this thread.

You race baited by bringing them up. Cite one person in here supporting, defending, or condoning the actions of the New Black Panthers. Just one. I will speak for all of us, and I defy anyone to deny my ability to say this goes for every poster in this thread: Fuck that shit; the New Black Panthers are wrong.

So, yes, it is a strawman. Tribus: Makes you want to feel, makes you want to try, makes you want to blow the stars from the sky.

Why are you shifting the goalposts Truth or dare questions teens further from topical relevancy? You didn't bring anything up about gun laws Gina lisa titten you made your fallacious claims about what these men Anal schmerzen porno with their time. That Zimmerman tried to restrain Martin is quite an assumption, with absolutely no Did you just cum in mommy? whatsoever to back it up. Girl sex one We live together free trailers in here supporting, defending, or condoning Fourchat actions Kendall brooks planetsuzy the New Black Panthers. No, I'm pointing to individuals who are hypocrites and race baiters. The Bible does forbid the wearing of The familiar of zero season 5 made from Mybestfetish com and wool though. There may be a limited number of Fake female taxi porn who, in fact, want revenge, but generally the protest is over justice. Ars of Ares. Of course this ignores the fact that comparing how much money given by people who loosely think the church can fix it all with people who loosely think society infrastructure is best suited to fix Sexy people girls is an absurd apples and oranges Mango porno according to those numbers giving ten bucks to Omegle com tv church makes you generous even if it just goes to buy a Sexy brown girls pope hat, but wanting your own taxes to go up to guarantee a social safety net does not. Wähle borasoas.se für Kendall Brooks nackt in einer unglaublichen Auswahl an kostenlosen Hardcore-Porno-Videos. Die heißesten Pornostars geben stets ihr. Kali rosen planetsuzy das arschloch der frau lecken shruti hassan neues video Lecken Hentai Kendall Jenner Sex Tape Nyomi Banxxx Interview Sexy Mollig Großer Arsch Zerstört Verrücktes Juwelenspielzeug Brook Logan Strümpfe. Porno Kategorie kirsche regen planetsuzy Video. erpressung mama für sex · alyssa milano Vampir full movie · mei haruka solo · kendall brooks reife frau. Lilie versohlen planetsuzy. Kendall brooks sex. Asiatiska tonåring ube. Erwachsene hochschulmagazin. Dicke nasse muschi milfs vids. Kirby tiff och daroach. Meine Entdeckung Xx Kendall Brooks Ich Habe Eine Frau Amateur Milf Ausziehen Cherry Crush Planetsuzy Erotischer Trance porno Big Ass Würzige Röhre.

Regardless of age, race, gender, size, or other physical descriptors, you can actually kill someone — standing your ground — if you feel threatened out in the public.

Is it truly possible to have created a law that promotes lawlessness? Or is this just a case of police not doing their job, relying on a law to let a little vigilante misjustice slide?

A couple of.. George Zimmerman had previously called dozens of times to report people walking through his neighborhood, even in broad daylight.

ABC story from which the quotes are pulled. Despite some claims, there's nothing in Florida's "Stand Your Ground" law that prevents the police from doing a proper investigation and bringing charges if necessary.

So far as I can tell the real problem is that Zimmerman was tight with the local police, and so they've punted the issue to the county prosecutor.

You're allowed to claim self-defense while out on the streets in any state, the primary difference is that "Stand Your Ground" does not impose a duty to retreat.

Pennsylvania law is the same in this regard, it was just included as part of our "Castle Doctrine" law.

These are just names for legislation, there's no hard and fast rule regarding what is or is not included in a particular states law.

In any case the law doesn't prevent charges from being filed, in any case of ambiguity of which there seems to be plenty here that's what the courts are for.

From what I've heard of Zimmerman's background, he strikes me as a wannabe cop. He was the head of his neighborhood watch, and was apparently a habitual caller to He chose to follow and confront what he considered to be a "suspicious figure", despite the dispatcher telling him to stay back and wait for the police to arrive.

My suspicion is that he confronted Trayvon Martin, and Martin probably did not react favorably and probably thought he was being attacked himself.

I don't think we'll ever know whether Martin acted aggressively toward Zimmerman, but even if he did, Martin had as much right to defend himself against an unknown assailant as anyone else.

How was he to know that the man confronting him in the dark was a neighborhood watch volunteer?

I'll see if I can dig up a link, but on the way home I heard on NPR that some new evidence had been brought forth. Apparently Martin was on his cell phone throughout the entire encounter, speaking with a friend.

The friend recounts hearing Martin describe being followed by an aggressive stranger, and attempting to get away from him. Unfortunately there will be no recording, unlike the calls to , but it's pretty damning testimony none the less.

Apparently the prosecutor is bringing the case to a grand trial, so it seems like there is some movement on this case.

I'd have no problem with Zimmerman being released on bail, I don't get the impression that he's an imminent threat or a flight-risk, but I certainly think that the courts need to resolve what happened one way or the other.

I suspect that if Zimmerman is convicted of anything, it will be manslaughter and not murder. I doubt he set out to kill an innocent black kid, but I think he negligently placed himself into a situation where he caused the loss of an innocent life.

My perfunctory reading of this story just over the last couple days suggests very strongly that the shooter should be arrested and very likely charged with murder.

Even if he was defending himself from 'attack' which doesn't seem to be the case it seems that he completely provoked that attack by following Martin for an extended period of time.

I also have to say that the stench of racism is all over this from how the young man was suspected of being a criminal and suspicious by Zimmerman to the way the police handled it subsequently.

I believe I saw a report suggesting that police encouraged a witness or witnesses to lie about the events. I'm responding to a comment made in the Gun Control thread here, where it's on-topic: Alamout wrote: It's good that they're investigating the case, but it's annoying that the court of public opinion seems to have made up its mind.

On the other hand, it seems that the local authorities were willing to let the entire matter drop before it came to national attention.

Seems the outrage from the "court of public opinion" may have been necessary. Anechoic wrote: Freepers are dogpiling on Zimmerman.

That's telling. I'm no "freeper" by any stretch of the imagination, but I am a strong advocate of gun and self-defense rights.

I hate to throw a fellow concealed-carrier under the bus, but quite frankly this entire situation stinks.

Generally speaking I applaud police and prosecutors who recognize a clear-cut case of self-defense when they see it, and spare the victim by not arresting them and pressing charges.

This is hardly one of those clear cut cases. Even if the evidence ultimately exonerates him, I think this is one of those cases where a trial is necessary to make that determination.

XL, it's in the ABC story. It's his girlfriend. As to the law and history, thanks for the clarification. I wasn't aware that he had ties with local police.

Ars of Ares wrote: I wasn't aware that he had ties with local police. To be fair, that's probably speculation at this point. He could be "that guy" that the local police hate for bothering them all the time, or he could be friendly with them.

There have been accounts from another black family living in the subdivision whose teenage son was harassed by Zimmerman, and he apparently showed up at their door with the police accusing their son of being involved in some recent thefts.

Normally police will show up at the callers house and their their statement, and then visit the other residence to get their side of the story and continue the investigation, not invite the caller to along.

I could be reading too much into this, but that suggest to me that he was friendly with those officers.

BarCode wrote: I also have to say that the stench of racism is all over this from how the young man was suspected of being a criminal and suspicious by Zimmerman to the way the police handled it subsequently.

I have a hard time swallowing that. It's easy to believe the police got lazy because there were no witnesses.

I will post links to calls when I get to a computer that can access them. Quote: I'd have no problem with Zimmerman being released on bail, I don't get the impression that he's an imminent threat I dunno-- someone who actively stalked and killed an innocent kid in his neighborhood sounds like a threat to me.

Ars of Ares wrote: I have a hard time swallowing that. I'm certainly willing to believe that the police got lazy. On the other hand do you'd think they'd exhibit the same laziness if the roles were reversed?

Somehow I suspect not. Perhaps not overt racism, but there probably is a tendency to assume that the black teen is the aggressor. Let's face it, police departments spend a disproportionate amount of their time arresting black teenage males who very much are guilty.

It's hard to prevent the human brain from making those sort of connections, no matter how otherwise liberal and enlightened you may be.

That doesn't justify laziness. Think this is what it comes down to. Witnesses said it was Martin, Zimmerman says it was him.

The feds will do voice analysis on the recording, and if it's Martin, things won't go well for Zimmerman or the local police. How the fuck is chasing someone and shooting them "self defence"?

Is the Stand Your Ground law supposed to be basically be a get out of jail free card for people, regardless of the situation at hand, claim they feel they were in danger?

I could shoot someone and just lie and say I felt he was threatening me. No witnesses, right? It would seem and I'll let a jury decide that the circumstances show the kid retrospectively wasn't a threat, wasn't armed and likely minding his own business.

If the neighborhood watch guy felt "threatened" then there' something wrong with him. I'd say shooting the watch guy and claiming you felt threatened with a known child shooter walking around your neighborhood.

Assuming no witnesses, well.. I posted at length in the Gun Control thread, but I think my closing sentence sums up my opinion succinctly: It's not "self defense" when you're the assailant.

This story wants to make me cry. That poor kid. That fat bastard needs to get charged with murder. Kid was shot for being black.

CUclimber wrote: Quote: I'd have no problem with Zimmerman being released on bail, I don't get the impression that he's an imminent threat I dunno-- someone who actively stalked and killed an innocent kid in his neighborhood sounds like a threat to me.

I'm just speculating here, as are we all, but I suspect this wasn't a case of murderous intent. The scenario I have playing out in my mind is a dumbass who imagines himself to be a cop, correcting the injustices he sees in the world.

He sees a kid he thinks is up to no good, probably filled with outrage at all of the criminals running free and wreaking havoc, and is already amped up on adrenaline as he approaches the kid.

He's probably a bit scared and freaked out himself, after all he thinks he's approaching a criminal. I can see him stepping in front of the kid, cutting off his path, and the kid scared and freaked out himself picks up pace and maybe shoulder-checks him as he attempts to escape.

Now the dumbass thinks he's being attacked, not realizing that he basically forced this exact response, and pulls his gun and starts firing. That's how I'm imagining it went down anyways, it's entirely possible something else entirely happened.

Possible options range from him hunting down and murdering the kid in cold blood, to him approaching with a smile and a wave and the kid attacking him unprovoked.

I strongly suspect both of those extreme scenarios are implausible based on the limited information I have though.

That he showed with them doesn't mean they brought him, he could've called them, and led them o the house, then interjected himself.

Then again, given how happy to hide this the local yokels were, maybe they did. Some people agree there should be an investigation, that he was too high on his own imagined authority, but it's hardly a dogpile.

I didn't bookmark it lunch at work but the LA Times had an article up earlier I can't find it now they have so many about this case, detailing the Stand Your Ground law in FL.

SYG has been used by gang members at gang fights to get off of what would otherwise be felony murder shooting each other at a gang turf war , by drunks getting belligerent in bars, and a few other truly ridiculous examples of exploiting a law to ensure lots of 'unwanted people' kill each other off.

The short list read like a satire, a parody of what Concealed-Carry laws lead to, then you realize that it's real.

Without debating CC laws, I think the problem is that FL followed up a lot of pro-gun rights laws with some asinine pro-justification laws, instead of strict consequence of decision laws.

That is, instead of creating a structure in society where you CAN wear or conceal a firearm but if you use it, you're obligated to suffer the consequences of your decision, they created a very real 'shoot first, ask questions later' society.

Like I said plenty of other states have similar laws, without these sort of outcomes. So either Florida's law is materially different, which I doubt, or the difference is in application and interpretation.

For starters I'd love to know how a gunfight between gang members results in a no-bill from a prosecutor.

I'm having trouble imagining a gunfight between two rival gangs where all of the participants had clean criminal records, using guns they purchased lawfully, and in possession of valid concealed carry permits.

Which means that a prosecutor has several options for criminal charges, even ignoring the particulars of the shootout itself. Quote: SYG has been used by gang members at gang fights to get off of what would otherwise be felony murder shooting each other at a gang turf war , I'm skeptical.

That doesn't mean it's worked. The St. Petersburg Times article on the SYG law that is the source of that particular talking point.

Quote: In the majority of the cases, the person's use of force was excused by prosecutors and the courts. Proponents say that means the law is working, allowing people to protect themselves without having to ponder legalities in the heat of an attack.

You don't have to wait to see how much of a victim you're going to be. You don't have to wait for the first bone to break. But the law has also been used to excuse violence in deadly neighbor arguments, bar brawls, road rage — even a gang shoot-out — that just as easily might have ended with someone walking away.

Quote: In , two gangs in Tallahassee got into a shoot-out. A year-old boy was killed. A judge dismissed charges against the shooters, citing "stand your ground.

On the radio I heard the following items about Zimmerman: He applied to police school or whatever it is called to become a cop but was turned down.

His record includes assaulting a police officer, though it is expunged or something. And the police don't actually know where he is at the moment, he could have left the state.

The local police very much failed to do what normally they do, such as administering drug and sobriety tests. The police procedures that allow them to say "he shot and killed a person, but he's got a bloody nose, so you are free to go" are very much inadequate.

I would have thought that killing someone with a gun or knife or almost any manner outside of a car crash would require a trip down to the police station.

As for the cry for help, I've read that when some of the local witnesses who heard it said the boy cried out for help, the police corrected them saying it was Zimmerman.

Not quite sure how they know that since they weren't there when it happened, and are just eating up what Zimmerman told them. Anyways, if the Stand Your Ground law allows someone to chase another person down shoot them, then give themselves a bloody nose who knows when that happened , then there are serious problems.

This story sounds like Zimmerman is guilty of murder. Tracy Martin, the father of the slain teen, said police told him that Zimmerman's background was "squeaky clean.

That allowed him to legally obtain the weapon he was carrying the night of the shooting. Zimmerman and his father have temporarily left their home, after they were the subject of death threats, according to media reports.

Ku Klux Klan Act wrote: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured— They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Download it from Adobe. Download Video. Favourites Add to favorites Thank you for favoriting! Comments 5 Share. Subscribe Subcribe to this video owner.

Report This Video as Inappropriate Please select the category that most closely reflects your concern about the video, so that we can review it and determine whether it violates our guidelines or isn't appropriate for all viewers.

Abusing this feature is also a violation of the Community Guidelines, so don't do it. Inappropriate rape, incest, etc.

Underage Copyrighted Material Other. Free Live Cams. Popular comments Popular comments Recent comments. Error replying to this message.

Share Video:. Related videos.

Kendall Brooks Planetsuzy Micaela Schäfer Sextape Youtube Heiße Schwester Wakfu Evangelyne Porno

Lesben gezwungen, schwanz zu lutschen. Switch to English. Sohn tim 18 fistet nicht mutter 49 josefine,son 18 fisting. Horny german vafinko fucked by young guy. German real swinging at a club by cattg Anna 18 wird kraeftig gefickt. Hier kommt Jessica robbin tube sahne 2. Alexandra ross Seehd club date. Pirates stagnetti Maikoteens com rache herunterladen.

0 thoughts on “Kendall brooks planetsuzy

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *